<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>http://scta.info/resoure/pgb1q18-d1e467/critical/transcription</title>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <p/>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <p/>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <p xml:id="pgb1q18-d1e467">
              Contra 
              <cit>
                <ref xml:id="pg-b1q18-Rd1e444" target="http://scta.info/resource/pgb1q18-d1e210">primam conclusionem</ref>
                <bibl>Vide supra.</bibl>
              </cit>,
              arguitur, 
              si non esset simpliciter necessarium 
              aliquam creaturam esse iustam, 
              sequeretur quod Deus oppositum illius 
              <pb ed="#L" n="59-r"/> 
              quod aeternaliter ordinavit posset facere. 
              Consequens est falsum 
              quia tunc Deus esset mutabilis. 
              Et consequentia patet quia, 
              si non necessario sic est sicut ordinavit, 
              oppositum poterit evenire.  
              Confirmatur quia aeternaliter 
              praedestinando <c>a</c> voluit ipsum fore iustum.
            </p>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>