<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>http://scta.info/resoure/pgb1q18-d1e163/en/transcription</title>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <p/>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <p/>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <p xml:id="pgb1q18-d1e163">
              In the second place principally, 
              it would follow that God 
              would be able to be the formal ratio 
              making the will pleasing. 
              The consequence is clear, 
              the falsity is proved because, 
              if so, 
              then it follows 
              that it would be possible 
              there to be motion of ordered love 
              in the created mind. 
              The consequent is false 
              since motion indicates an imperfection.
            </p>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>