<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>http://scta.info/resoure/pgb1q15-d1e1083/critical/transcription</title>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <p/>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <p/>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <p xml:id="pgb1q15-d1e1083" n="Conclusio 7">
            Septima conclusio: 
            quod secundum 
            <ref xml:id="pg-b1q15-Rhpehed" corresp="#pg-b1q15-Qpemued">
              <name xml:id="pg-b1q15-Nd1e1108" ref="#HilaryOfPoitiers">Hilarium</name>
            </ref>,
            <cit>
              <quote xml:id="pg-b1q15-Qpemued">
                Pater est maior Filio, 
                Filius tamen non est minor Patre, nam 
                donans maior est sed
                <app>
                  <lem n="sed"/>
                  <rdg wit="#L" type="correction-deletion" facs="52v/6">
                    <del rend="strikethrough">l</del>
                  </rdg>
                </app> 
                minor iam non est cui unum ens donatur
              </quote>
              <bibl>
                <name>Hilarius</name>, 
                <title>De Trinitate</title> 
                IX, c. 54 
                (CCSL  62A, 432, ll. 24 - 433, ll. 31).
                <!--si igitur donantis... quia unum sunt.-->
              </bibl>
              <!-- https://books.google.com/books?id=z-QEwRRFLS8C&pg=PA223&lpg=PA223&dq=Maior+itaque+donans+est,sed+minor+iam+non+est+cui+vnum+esse+donarur&source=bl&ots=SAmFYSKlT8&sig=Pq4KJZ3Vu4IFnOFpTrTdFA0xKrs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjY_KyilM_aAhWOT98KHbLnBbAQ6AEwAHoECAAQKg#v=onepage&q=Maior%20itaque%20donans%20est%2Csed%20minor%20iam%20non%20est%20cui%20vnum%20esse%20donarur&f=false -->
            </cit>. 
            Nota tamen 
            quod li <mentioned>maior</mentioned> 
            non notat inequalitatem essentialem, 
            sed solum auctoritatem notionalem originis 
            quia Pater originat Filium, 
            Filius ergo est aequalis Patri in re habita 
            quia omnem perfectionem 
            quam habet Pater habet Filius. 
            Sed Pater dicitur maior Filio in modo habendi 
            quia Filius illam perfectionem 
            habet a Patre et non econverso. 
            Notat etiam quod 
            <name xml:id="pg-b1q15-Nd1e1145" ref="#HilaryOfPoitiers">Hilarius</name> 
            non concedit Filium minorem Patre tum 
            quia minoritas videtur importare indignitatem 
            tum quia voluit subtrahere 
            haereticis errorum occasionem et defensionem.
          </p>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>