<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>http://scta.info/resoure/pgb1q10-d1e1145/critical/transcription</title>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <p/>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <p/>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <p xml:id="pgb1q10-d1e1145">
                <cit>
                  <ref xml:id="pg-b1q10-Rd1e4925" target="http://scta.info/resource/pgb1q10-d1e782">Ad tertiam</ref>
                  <bibl>Vide supra.</bibl>
                </cit>,
                primo 
                negatur consequentia 
                quia similiter posset argui quod essentia haberet principium 
                quia ipsa est idem Filio. 
                Item, posset dici quod, 
                si sumatur <mentioned>principium</mentioned> pro durationis communicatione, 
                sic Filius et Spiritus Sanctus habent 
                principium quia, 
                sicut Pater communicat Filio deitatem, 
                ita et aeternitatem. 
                Si autem sumatur pro durationis limitatione, 
                sic nulla persona divina habet principium.
              </p>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>