<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>http://scta.info/resoure/pg-b3q4-d1e1160/lon/transcription</title>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <p/>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <p/>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <p xml:id="pg-b3q4-d1e1160">
                <g ref="#pilcrow"/>Ad 2m argumentum principale conclusionis quod videtur facere contra dicta in 
          <lb ed="#L" n="38"/>2a conclusione negatur antecedens et cum probatur quia aliqui invincibiliter etc <g ref="#slash"/> dicitur primo quod si tales 
          <lb ed="#L" n="39"/>infideles facerent quod in se est illuminarentur a deo et virtutes eis infunderentur  
          <pb ed="#L" n="215-r"/>
                <lb ed="#L" n="1"/>et ideo tales non ignorant christum ininvincibiliter et quando dicitur quod omem genus 
          <lb ed="#L" n="2"/>tormenti etc dicitur quod illi stante eorum infidelitate non faciunt aliquid propter deum 
          <lb ed="#L" n="3"/>unde potest dici quod si facerent talia propter deum superficialiter aestimative optando 
          <lb ed="#L" n="4"/>non tamen libere affective taliter vere virtuose sicut debent opera sua in deum 
          <lb ed="#L" n="5"/>dirigenda </p>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>