<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>http://scta.info/resoure/ol96b1-c27573-d1e997/cod-pa96b1/transcription</title>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <p/>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <p/>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <p xml:id="ol96b1-c27573-d1e997">
                  <lb ed="#L" n="11"/>Praeterea: Delectatio proueniens ex amore, 
      <lb ed="#L" n="12"/>aut est idem realiter quod amor, aut aliud, si idem 
      <lb ed="#L" n="13"/>realiter, contradictio est, quod proueniat ex eo, 
      <lb ed="#L" n="14"/>cum causa, &amp; effectus non possint esse eadem 
      <lb ed="#L" n="15"/>res, cum idem non sit causa sui, nec proueniat ex 
      <lb ed="#L" n="16"/>se, aut sequatur se. Si vero sit aliud realiter non 
      <lb ed="#L" n="17"/>se habent delectatio, &amp; amor, sicut 
      compre<lb ed="#L" break="no" n="18"/>hensio, &amp; visio: comprehensio namque Dei ab 
      <lb ed="#L" n="19"/>intellectu, non est aliud, quam visio ipsa, tunc 
      <lb ed="#L" n="20"/>intellectus haberet duas operationes circa 
      <lb ed="#L" n="21"/>Deum praesentem, videlicet comprehendere, 
      <lb ed="#L" n="22"/>&amp; videre. ergo si amare, &amp; delectari realiter 
      <lb ed="#L" n="23"/>distinguuntur, tunc isti Doctores opposita 
      di<lb ed="#L" break="no" n="24"/>cunt, dicentes, quod se habent sicut 
      comprehen<lb ed="#L" break="no" n="25"/>dere, &amp; videre. 
    </p>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>