<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>http://scta.info/resoure/iu7r3b-d1e60-d1e7986/cod-dsKs3a/transcription</title>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <p/>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <p/>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <p xml:id="iu7r3b-d1e60-d1e7986">
            <lb ed="#J" n="24"/>
            <pc type="indent"/>Nos autem dicamus, si hoc
            no<lb ed="#J" n="25" break="no"/>men quiditas dicatur de
            quiditati<lb ed="#J" n="26" break="no"/>bus rerum materialium, &amp; de quidita 
            <lb ed="#J" n="27"/>tibus intellectuum abstractorum 
            mo<lb ed="#J" n="28" break="no"/>do vniuoco, tunc propositio dicens 
            <lb ed="#J" n="29"/>quod intellectus natus est abstrahere qui 
            <lb ed="#J" n="30"/>ditates in eo quod sunt quiditates, erit 
            <lb ed="#J" n="31"/>vera: &amp; similiter dicere quod
            intel<lb ed="#J" n="32" break="no"/>ecta esse composita, &amp; indiuidua es 
            <lb ed="#J" n="33"/>se composita fuerit vniuocum. si
            au<lb ed="#J" n="34" break="no"/>tem aequiuocum, tunc
            demonstra<lb ed="#J" n="35" break="no"/>tio non erit vera. Quomodo autem, 
            <lb ed="#J" n="36"/>est valde difficile. manifestum est enim 
            <lb ed="#J" n="37"/>per se quod hoc nomen quiditas non
            di<lb ed="#J" n="38" break="no"/>citur de eis pure vniuoce, neque pure 
            <lb ed="#J" n="39"/>aequiuoce. vtrum autem dicatur 
            mul<lb ed="#J" n="40" break="no"/>tipliciter quod est medium, indiget 
            <lb ed="#J" n="41"/>consyderatione. 
            <!-- l3-36-com-17 -->
            <!--Averroes_DeAnima_JuntSecunda_11-0377.xml-->
            <pb ed="#J" n="182-v"/>
            <cb ed="#J" n="a"/>
          </p>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>